Three typical situations I work with.
Each starts looking like a different problem but ends with the same need: someone reads the situation honestly and proposes a workable plan.
Calls get rescheduled. Updates come less often. The work chat where work used to happen has slowly gone silent. Maybe the team is overloaded; maybe your project lost priority; maybe a key developer left. Either way — response is slower than you need, and the spend keeps running. First job: honestly figure out whether the relationship can be repaired, or whether it should end cleanly.
Started at $40K. Now at $80K with the original feature list still incomplete. Every change request lands with another "this will need two more weeks." You can't tell whether it's legitimate scope change or just stretching the project. First job: separate real scope changes from padding, renegotiate the agreement on transparent terms, restore progress against milestones.
People are engaged. Standups happen. Sprint reviews show movement. But the actual shipping has halted — and nobody inside the team can name why. First job: read the situation from outside the politics — process, scope, technical assumptions — and surface the real blocker without damaging the relationship.